CleanVision System

Smart Alerts

A one-tap emergency button for your team, with a response window defined by your service level and a confirmation loop that only you can close.

Request a free assessment

The complaint that reaches you first is already too late

A tenant tells the receptionist. The receptionist mentions it to facilities. Facilities emails the account manager. The account manager forwards it to the supervisor. Somewhere in there it gets fixed, or it doesn’t, and nobody can say precisely when anything happened.

By the time a problem has travelled that path, two things are true: it has been visible to building users for a while, and the record of it is a chain of forwarded messages nobody will be able to reconstruct in a month.

One tap, straight to the people who can act

Your team raises an alert directly — no phone tree, no email chain. The reason is categorised, because a restroom out of supplies and a spill in reception need different responses and shouldn’t arrive as identical free text.

It reaches the assigned team immediately by email, SMS and push at the same time. Not one channel with fallbacks, all three — the failure mode we’re designing against is a single notification arriving on a phone that’s on silent.

The window belongs to the contract

Response time is defined by your service level and measured against every alert. It is not a number we put on a website and hope nobody times.

That’s a deliberate structure. A clinic and a distribution centre have genuinely different requirements, and a single advertised response time either overpromises for one or overprices the other. Yours is agreed, written down, and reported against.

An alert approaching its window escalates automatically. That matters more than it sounds: on a difficult night, the thing that gets forgotten is not the problem itself, it’s the decision to escalate it. Removing that decision from human judgment is the point.

Only you can close it

An alert is resolved when the person who raised it confirms the response was adequate.

We cannot mark our own alerts solved, and that constraint is the one that makes the whole mechanism worth anything. Any vendor that can close its own tickets will report excellent response statistics — the numbers measure the vendor’s opinion of itself. Requiring your confirmation means the metric measures whether the problem actually went away.

Alerts and their response times feed the account’s operational record and its Protex Verified score, alongside corrective actions. A pattern of alerts from the same area is treated as a recurring issue — the fix is upstream, in the scope or the stock levels, not in responding faster to the same failure every week.

How you verify it

Delivered is not the same as proven

Every service below reports into CleanVision, so the work leaves a record you can audit — not a promise you have to trust.

  • The window is contractual

    Response time is not a promise on a webpage. It is agreed per service level and measured against every alert raised.

  • We can't mark it solved

    An alert closes when the person who raised it confirms. A vendor that can close its own tickets will always have excellent statistics.

  • Escalation is automatic

    An alert approaching its window escalates without anyone deciding to escalate it. That decision is exactly what gets missed on a busy night.

Common questions

It depends on the service level you contract — the window is defined there and measured against it, rather than being a single number we advertise to everyone. Different buildings need different guarantees, and a clinic's requirements shouldn't be priced into a warehouse's contract.

Excellence isn't a promise — it's a guarantee

Request a free assessment of your facility and see what a proactive operation catches that a reactive one bills you for later.

Talk to Protex